On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The point is that for years fedora has had a scheme of package > requirements and no standard-compliant JVM that provided them. And it has a > strange symlinked path scheme that needs to be fixed when installing a > standard JVM. I find the symlink/alternatives structure *so much* better than having to munge the PATH and JAVA_HOME environment variables that I don't understand why you're complaining about it. > You are confusing 2 issues. By standard-compliant, I mean the language > spec which does exist and as far as I know, nothing fedora has ever shipped, > meets. I couldn't find the status of OpenJDK 6 is with respect to the TCK in a brief search, but if Fedora's shipped package didn't pass I think it would be regarded as an important bug. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
