On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:32:16 -0700, darrell pfeifer scripst: > I didn't realize that turning off selinux meant I was such a bad tester. > I just thought it meant there were some parts of the system that I was > unwilling to test. I don't feel cheap or irresponsible. > > If testing selinux is such an important part of the testing agreement, > please publish this information in a written rather than tacit place. No turning off selinux doesn't make you bad tester, certainly not. But the point I have is that it is really not that bad -- there ARE many bugs in SELinux policy (because it is built against moving target of still changing Fedora), but OTOH dwalsh is really unbelievable -- bugs I filed with him in CC list (he prefers to file bugs against the programs which have problems) and SELinux keyword are in 80% of cases (or even more) fixed to the next day. And I have filed many many many bugs for him :-) Matej -- The content of this message is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, Some Rights Reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
