2008/3/31 Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Selinux keeps proving me that it deserves to shut down. i can't help > > it that it blames me for playing flash animation, using a gif > > animation in a local web folder or oven just installing updates from > > fedora itself.. > > > > > > > > > > Actually you CAN help.. you CAN help by taking the hint i provided earlier > and start talking to people through the test list so we can troubleshoot the > specific messages you have been seeing..instead of doing what you are doing > right now, which is failing to communicate with enough specificity for > anyone to confirm or help track down so things can be fixed. Clearly you've > made up you mind... you decided you don't WANT to help. That's fine.. that's > your choice... but do so with the understanding that by doing so you cheapen > the testing process that the pre-releases is meant to fulfill. By choosing > to ignore selinux completely, you certainly aren't living up to the implied > agreement to act as a responsible tester when you chose to make use of the > pre-releases. > -jef"permissive mode is a available a compromise"spaleta > Yes, security is a compromise. Having dealt with selinux for quite some time I've typically tried it, re-tried it, re-tried it again, weighed my options and turned it off. I didn't realize that turning off selinux meant I was such a bad tester. I just thought it meant there were some parts of the system that I was unwilling to test. I don't feel cheap or irresponsible. If testing selinux is such an important part of the testing agreement, please publish this information in a written rather than tacit place. darrell darrell -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
