On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:39:29 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > How bad would it Fedora take it if I were to go with this > > kernel-libre project, the way it is now, through the Fedora package > > submission process? > > Badly. No alternative kernels. If you can't do it in the kernel > package that already exists, then you'll have to do it outside of > Fedora. > > > I'd very much like to be able to use Fedora CVS to maintain this > > (although I do have permission from FSFLA to maintain it there > > instead), and I'd very much like to use Fedora build machinery and > > binary hosting, even if this kernel isn't actually included in > > releases, even if it's excluded from rawhide. > > > > Does this sound like something that would be outright rejected, to > > the point that it doesn't make sense for me to even try? > > Yes. > > > Or does it make sense to start the discussion in the context of an > > official package submission? > > IMO, no. What Josh said Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
