Re: kernel-libre (hopefully 100% Free) for Fedora 8 and rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 25, 2008, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (Note that Fedora 9 is already past feature freeze any way...)

That means not adding new features.  How about removing?


Now, seriously...

How bad would it Fedora take it if I were to go with this kernel-libre
project, the way it is now, through the Fedora package submission
process?

I'd very much like to be able to use Fedora CVS to maintain this
(although I do have permission from FSFLA to maintain it there
instead), and I'd very much like to use Fedora build machinery and
binary hosting, even if this kernel isn't actually included in
releases, even if it's excluded from rawhide.

Does this sound like something that would be outright rejected, to the
point that it doesn't make sense for me to even try?

Or does it make sense to start the discussion in the context of an
official package submission?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux