seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:13 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:seth vidal wrote:On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:no! This was the first action after F9 install, and I did not modify any yum configuration.I'm afraid I can't duplicate this. I only see x86_64 and noarch packages in my install list. Couple things, first, file a bug and let this list know the bug number. If you don't have an account, we'll continue on list, but in bugzilla would be best. Next, attach an rpm -qa |grep i386 output. Next attach the yum.out file from 'yum -d9 groupinstall "KDE Software Development" >yum.out 2>&1'Was this a fresh F9beta install or an update?It was a fresh F9beta installAccording to the bug report you filed you're using yum 3.2.8 for F9Beta? F9beta shipped with yum 3.2.12.
I downloaded the iso yesterday afternoon immediately after the announcement :-)Site: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/9-Beta/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-9-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso
Is this the wrong iso? JB
you didn't install from beta. -sv
-- Joachim Backes <joachim.backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> University of Kaiserslautern,Computer Center [RHRK], Systems and Operations, High Performance Computing, D-67653 Kaiserslautern, PO Box 3049, Germany -------------------------------------------------- Phone: +49-631-205-2438, FAX: +49-631-205-3056
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
