On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:36 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:13 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > >> seth vidal wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > >>>>> no! This was the first action after F9 install, and I did not modify > >>>>> any yum configuration. > >>>> I'm afraid I can't duplicate this. I only see x86_64 and noarch > >>>> packages in my install list. > >>>> > >>>> Couple things, first, file a bug and let this list know the bug number. > >>>> If you don't have an account, we'll continue on list, but in bugzilla > >>>> would be best. > >>>> > >>>> Next, attach an rpm -qa |grep i386 output. > >>>> > >>>> Next attach the yum.out file from 'yum -d9 groupinstall "KDE Software > >>>> Development" >yum.out 2>&1' > >>>> > >>> Was this a fresh F9beta install or an update? > >> It was a fresh F9beta install > >> > > > > According to the bug report you filed you're using yum 3.2.8 for F9Beta? > > F9beta shipped with yum 3.2.12. > > I downloaded the iso yesterday afternoon immediately after the announcement :-) > Site: > http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/9-Beta/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-9-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso > > Is this the wrong iso? > And you installed that on a machine you'd never installed before or you formatted the disk? B/c there is no way you get yum 3.2.8 from 9Beta. Just not possible. Anyway - it doesn't matter: run: yum update yum\* then re-run your earlier command. problem solved. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
