On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:13 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > >>> no! This was the first action after F9 install, and I did not modify > >>> any yum configuration. > >> I'm afraid I can't duplicate this. I only see x86_64 and noarch > >> packages in my install list. > >> > >> Couple things, first, file a bug and let this list know the bug number. > >> If you don't have an account, we'll continue on list, but in bugzilla > >> would be best. > >> > >> Next, attach an rpm -qa |grep i386 output. > >> > >> Next attach the yum.out file from 'yum -d9 groupinstall "KDE Software > >> Development" >yum.out 2>&1' > >> > > > > Was this a fresh F9beta install or an update? > > It was a fresh F9beta install > According to the bug report you filed you're using yum 3.2.8 for F9Beta? F9beta shipped with yum 3.2.12. you didn't install from beta. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
