On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:23 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > >>> no! This was the first action after F9 install, and I did not modify > >>> any yum configuration. > >> I'm afraid I can't duplicate this. I only see x86_64 and noarch > >> packages in my install list. > >> > >> Couple things, first, file a bug and let this list know the bug number. > >> If you don't have an account, we'll continue on list, but in bugzilla > >> would be best. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438966 > > >> > >> Next, attach an rpm -qa |grep i386 output. > > <empty> > > >> > >> Next attach the yum.out file from 'yum -d9 groupinstall "KDE Software > >> Development" >yum.out 2>&1' > > See attachment! > >> > > > > Was this a fresh F9beta install or an update? > > Fresh install. > okay: 1. you're running yum 3.2.8 - so it wasn't a fresh install of F9Beta. I don't know what it was but it wasn't F9Beta 2. I think the bug you're seeing is fixed in F9Beta. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
