On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:07PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 00:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:35 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > >> I don't think that anyone has said that you can't make a special > > >> spin with this kernel in it. > > > > > > For what it is worth, I actually am saying that such a spin can't be > > > called Fedora, under the existing trademark guidelines, since I am > > > opposed to any "alternative kernel" packages in the Fedora repository. > > > > Well, there is still something called kernel-xen. > > Yes, but it isn't a separate package, it is built off the kernel SRPM. actually it was completely separate. Which is why it was stuck at 2.6.21, whilst kernel was quite a few revisions ahead. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
