On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:33:32AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:35 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >>I don't think that anyone has said that you can't make a special > >>spin with this kernel in it. > > > >For what it is worth, I actually am saying that such a spin can't be > >called Fedora, under the existing trademark guidelines, since I am > >opposed to any "alternative kernel" packages in the Fedora repository. > > Well, there is still something called kernel-xen. Which is scheduled for extermination with extreme prejudice. It has been a support disaster of unimaginable magnitude. We tried to kill it for F9 but couldn't get the paravirt_ops patches far enough along to merge them back into the main kernel RPM. Come F10 though it will either be merged in main kernel RPM, or Xen will have to say goodbye. Dan. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
