On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 00:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 12:35 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> I don't think that anyone has said that you can't make a special > >> spin with this kernel in it. > > > > For what it is worth, I actually am saying that such a spin can't be > > called Fedora, under the existing trademark guidelines, since I am > > opposed to any "alternative kernel" packages in the Fedora repository. > > Well, there is still something called kernel-xen. Yes, but it isn't a separate package, it is built off the kernel SRPM. If "kernel-libre" was generated from the kernel SRPM like "kernel-xen" is, I would be ok with it, but it doesn't seem like that is a feasible option, since the firmware would still be in the kernel SRPM. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
