Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"VS" == Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> writes:VS> And by the way, in my opinion the discussion should not be only VS> about Unicode, but about restricting package names even to a VS> subset of ASCII (let's say eg. a-z, A-Z, 0-9, -, +, _, .). This is why we need a concrete proposal to vote on. Things would have gone much better if we had one.
+1One of the problems I have with "ban packages with unicode names" is that it doesn't consider what to do when a package name upstream is non-ASCii. My -1 vote is really a vote against having the Fedora packager make up a name for an upstream package which I very strongly oppose. If a proposal were written that told what the packager needs to do to get an acceptable package name I'd likely abstain or (possibly) agree.
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
