On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:39 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > It is quite a different thing to point out that a decision > has flaws and is causing problems as David did, than to insult > someone. What David is doing is blaming the Architectures policy for something it has nothing to do with. No Secondary Architectures have been enabled yet. He's using this issue as a soapbox to insult the work in progress as "ill-defined", and suggest that it "should be dropped". I find that insulting and unproductive. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
