On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 18:04 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Packagers' lack of time or laziness is not a good excuse. If they > can't fix it, they should seek help either from the PPC SIG or > upstream. I'm inclined to agree, but I'm concerned about how realistic that is, especially since we encourage people to take responsibility for packages when they don't even understand the language they're written in and _can't_ fix things. I already see people who should know better complaining about how building for PPC is 'painful' -- and that kind of attitude has contributed to the idiocy of letting 'secondary architecture' builds fail _without_ aborting the main build. I don't want to make matters worse by increasing the perception that building for PPC is hard. If Fedora is after quantity instead of quality in packages and packagers, then I don't want to make life harder for the PPC folks just because we think that's a bad choice of priority. I'll tilt at one windmill at a time, thank you. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
