On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 11:07 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:17:38AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > architectures. (In fact, the whole distinction between primary and > > > secondary architectures is IMHO a bad idea and should be dropped). > > > > David, you keep saying this, and its rather unproductive and insulting. > > Tom - why is repeatedly pointing out the obvious "insulting". Surely not > listening is insulting. Its insulting to those of us who worked on the Secondary Architectures proposal, to the Fedora Steering Committee who ratified it, and the Fedora Board who signed off on it. If I continuously pointed out in public that your kernel efforts are junk, and should be abandoned, I suspect you would be less than pleased. The split between primary and secondary architectures enables secondary architectures to ramp up and grow, without unnecessarily burdening the Fedora infrastructure or packaging community. I've reached out to David and tried to work with him on resolving specific technical concerns, and he still reverts back to an attitude of badmouthing the entire effort. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
