On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:17 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:30 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Yes, there should. For _all_ architectures, not just secondary > > architectures. (In fact, the whole distinction between primary and > > secondary architectures is IMHO a bad idea and should be dropped). > > David, you keep saying this, and its rather unproductive and insulting. > Please, take the needle off your broken record. No. It was relevant in the context; Tom was talking about facilities which should be available for Fedora on secondary architectures when he should have been including _all_ architectures. Yet again, the artificial and ill-defined distinction was confusing. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
