On 03/03/2008, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:58:07AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > Are you sure? I grabbed the srpm and built it - it has dvipdfmx but not > > xdvipdfmx. > > > No, I'm not sure. Indeed xdvipdfmx I have installed comes from > texlive... So I guess that xdvipdfmx is really another upstream package. > I'll have a look when time permit. Yes, it's a bit of a crazy situation - first there's dvipdfm, which is the original project, which isn't really developed any longer, there's a fork which is dvipdfmx which is being developed, and it seems that's also been forked to give the xdvipdfmx project. Would be nice if these three codebases were merged. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
