Chris Adams wrote:
That was a rhetorical question. Fedora has codecbuddy that points to a proprietary MP3 plugin. Picking on Flash (where a company is providing a Fedora-compatible repo for their software) seems wrong when Fedora includes software that points at other proprietary software. Fedora can't provide fully-functional Flash, so why can Flash not be like MP3 and have Fedora point at the Adobe repo?
There is a open source version of Flash that we can legally include (atleast partially) in Fedora and would like to support. That isn't the case for MP3. This is why codeina has a large introductory message educating end users. Refer
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Codeina http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CodecBuddy Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
