Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said: > Flash is not an essential part of a person's life, you can do very well without > _any_ Flash player, Free or proprietary. Well, Fedora "is not an essential part of a person's life" either. However, I need a fully-functional Flash player as part of my job, because some vendor websites use it. If you are saying I shouldn't use Flash on Fedora, you are telling me I shouldn't use Fedora on my desktop. The free Flash players, as distributed in Fedora, will _always_ be broken, as they can't include MP3 for audio (at least until about 2017). If it allowable for codecbuddy to point to a gratis MP3 codec, why is it not allowable for something to point to a gratis Flash player, especially when it is the "standard" and the company behind it actually sets up a repo for use with Fedora (as opposed to the MP3 situation)? -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
