> Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces, >> which >> are already in Fedora. When I first got the package into Fedora, I >> stripped those out of the upstream tarball. A release later, upstream >> removed them. Then, a release after that, they put them back and I >> failed >> to notice. I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will >> do >> Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds. Do we need to pull the >> roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the >> roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient? >> >> Jon > > You had the PEAR bits included in roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 itself, but > have > removed them in roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1? (I just wasn't sure thats > what you > meant, I don't know the answer) :) Correct. > -- > Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net > gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B > 1DF3 > No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel > Geer > ---- > ---- > -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
