> > On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:13 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces, >> which >> are already in Fedora. When I first got the package into Fedora, I >> stripped those out of the upstream tarball. A release later, upstream >> removed them. Then, a release after that, they put them back and I >> failed >> to notice. I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will >> do >> Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds. Do we need to pull the >> roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the >> roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient? > > No, just fix the issue with updated packages for all relevant targets > and try to get upstream to understand why we're pulling this code out in > the first place. Ok, thanks, will do. Maybe at the same time, they can repond to my inquiries about: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423271 While I'm at it, maybe I'll get a unicorn, a Prius and $2m. > ~spot > -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
