Re: Licensing issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:13 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces, which
> are already in Fedora.  When I first got the package into Fedora, I
> stripped those out of the upstream tarball.  A release later, upstream
> removed them.  Then, a release after that, they put them back and I failed
> to notice.  I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will do
> Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds.  Do we need to pull the
> roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the
> roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient?

No, just fix the issue with updated packages for all relevant targets
and try to get upstream to understand why we're pulling this code out in
the first place.

~spot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux