Re: Licensing issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Ciesla wrote:
Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces, which
are already in Fedora.  When I first got the package into Fedora, I
stripped those out of the upstream tarball.  A release later, upstream
removed them.  Then, a release after that, they put them back and I failed
to notice.  I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will do
Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds.  Do we need to pull the
roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the
roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient?

Jon

You had the PEAR bits included in roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 itself, but have removed them in roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1? (I just wasn't sure thats what you meant, I don't know the answer) :)

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux