Re: long term support release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:23:37PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> 
> Now, cross your heart: Would /you/ run a LTS where there was /no/ QA or
> security team? At most for a month or so, until it is convenient to
> upgrade would be my answer. Feeling uneasy all the time.

Yes, I would, if I know that I can trust the packagers. I don't care
about QA and security team (though it is a nice bonus). I trust fedora
contributors to do things right, though, when they are (even selfishely) 
interested in something. And it could happen that some fedora contributors
are interested in doing Updates after the EOL. Although I wouldn't
certainly use such a release, if there was some infrastructure, I would
certainly try to fix critical issues in most of my own packages in such 
a setting (especially since I already do it in EPEL). I already do that
for the stable releases I don't use, so...

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux