Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:33:35AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Yet we have things like the Security team who have taken up the mantel > > of ensuring that security updates go out for the packages we shipped in > > "supported" releases, regardless of what happens to the owner of that > > package. They're having a hard enough time getting volunteers for this > > effort just for the 2 live releases, let along adding N number of LTS > > releases. > It is not because there are institutional agreements aimed at reducing, > for example, security issues, that it will work, since people are not > paid for that and there is no contract. > > Nobody is asking Security team to do things in fedora LTS. Now, cross your heart: Would /you/ run a LTS where there was /no/ QA or security team? At most for a month or so, until it is convenient to upgrade would be my answer. Feeling uneasy all the time. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
