On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:26:49AM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Jan 25, 2008 12:08 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Unless I am wrong new builds aren't allowed for EOL releases. And I also > > guess that at some point mirrors are shut down. Not doing those 2 things > > would really allow for a fedora LTS. > > Until someone comes up with a sound plan for an LTS deliverable that > communicates expectations on quality, I don't see a reason to just > open up the trees for random people to update random packages whenever > they want to. Random packages, maybe, but not random people, please. And there should not be any quality expectation just like for fedora itself. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
