On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 21:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > * Patrice Dumas [25/01/2008 16:48] : > >> I thought you were speaking about RHEL. But Centos is exactly in the > >> same case that 'fedora LTS' or fedora itself. Volunteers, no warranty, > >> no contract. > > > > CentOS doesn't actually do the work of backporting security fixes only. > > They take the work done by Red Hat and just rebuild the .rpms. > > > > If Fedora LTS happens, it will not have this option. > > .. unless Fedora LTS is a rebuild of RHEL SRPMS. There might be some > advantages to this worth considering. > do we need another centos but with a fedora brand? I think the centos guys are doing a good job, personally. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
