On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:43:07AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:37:47 +0100 > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > They should not as long as it is based on volunteers work. > > The greater mass of users just don't understand this. They don't care > who is doing the work, if you term it LTS they expect LTS qualities. I don't care about the name, in fact, if you think LTS is badly choosen, another name may be chosed, it is not the issue here. It corresponds with a product based on fedora infrastructure, but with th epossibility to update after the EOL. Call it fedora Updates after EOL if you like it better. > > > you know, there is a Fedora based release that promises long term > > > stability and quality... > > > > I know, but in that case there are customers, it is very different, > > there are contracts. > > Not with CentOS there isn't. I thought you were speaking about RHEL. But Centos is exactly in the same case that 'fedora LTS' or fedora itself. Volunteers, no warranty, no contract. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
