On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:47:49 +0100 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > If an "LTS" release doesn't guarantee stability and timely security > > updates, it shouldn't be called LTS. Maybe "Extended Support" or > > "More Volunteer Updates". But not LTS... > > The name is not the issue, as long as it is understood that it is a > volunteer based project. It isn't in the fedora name, but fedora is a > volunteer based project. What earthly reason would you have to run some old code set, with not even close to guaranteed updates, let alone timely ones, with little man power behind it, and the opportunity to be ignored by most package owners? And why aren't those reasons satisfied with RHEL/CentOS which doesn't have these problems? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
