Re: [OT] Re: f8 gripe#2: why did f8's pm-hibernate regress?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:19 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Dnia 04-01-2008, pią o godzinie 22:32 +0100, David Nielsen pisze:
> > tor, 03 01 2008 kl. 18:45 +0100, skrev nodata:
> > > I don't know why people keep saying this. Vista boots fast and is
> > > responsive.
> > 
> > Wow.. can I have a puff at that crack pipe my good man? :)
> 
> Sorry for offtopic. Vista needs few days (weeks?) of use to prime its
> readahead/preload¹ caches. It's slow just after install, but gets better
> with time. One have to give this OS time for all its tricks to show.
> 
> BTW, I'm not advocating for Vista. Just be serious and don't treat Vista
> with prejudice. Fedora is doing readahead also, but in less
> sophisticated way. http://preload.sf.net seems to be dead and broken by
> prelink. Why not learn how others are doing similar things?
> 
> ¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_I/O_technologies#SuperFetch
> 
> -- 
> Tomasz Torcz
> Crocom Computer Systems
> 

That package is getting worked on at the moment and it's currently
getting reviewed and hopefully included in Fedora soon.

Cheers,

Marc

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux