Till Maas wrote:
On Mi Januar 2 2008, Douglas McClendon wrote:
Can someone tell me if there is anything I can do to de-regress f8's
pm-hibernate?
pm-utils hibernation code does not differ much between f7 and f8.
My analysis is pure speculation based on my understanding of how you can
tune that behaviour with suspend2(tux-on-ice). But it is very noticable
and very annoying and very clearly a f7->f8 change.
I guess it is then a change in the kernel, but afaik the f7 and f8 kernel are
very similiar, too.
http://lwn.net/Articles/153203/
Just for the benefit of future web searchers with the same question,
here is an interesting thread covering the specific issue. My real
curiosity is still why the performance I see regressed so badly when I
upgraded to F8. The thread leads me to believe that the the F7 swsusp1
did not save caches. Hmm... I have been enjoying the convenience of
fedora's suspend-works-out-of-the-box for awhile now, but I think it
might be time for me to go back to tux-on-ice. I truly am disgusted by
having to suffer through 5-15 seconds of thrashing while changing
desktops after resume. I would much rather the resume take 20 seconds
longer, and present me with a good user experience. (yes, I am one of
those people that thinks that offering early login while the system
finishes booting is a really stupid thing).
-dmc
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
