On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:52:26PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > If a particular maintainer has those concerns he can raise them without > > having this veto power. This makes an unneeded assymetry between a > > primary maintainer and somebody who would like to do a compat package. > > There is no reason why a primary maintainer would be smarter than > > somebody wanting a compat package. > > I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on this point, since I > feel pretty strongly that the primary maintainer should have a voice in > this process since it could affect their workload. > > Regardless, as the proposal states, if the compat maintainer and the > primary maintainer cannot come to a mutual decision, it can be escalated > to FESCo to make the final decision. So this is not needed to * add yet more rules * show a preference for the primary maintainer since the same rules as always can simply apply. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
