On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 23:53 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Anybody can already raise his concerns about a compat package, why more > procedures and such a veto power for a particular packager? For the reasons spelled out in the proposal: 'The reasoning for the latter is that even if the primary maintainer is not maintaining the compatibility package, chances are that they will have to be involved in the maintenance due to passing along security problems, helping out with things and redirecting misfiled bugs.' /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
