Re: f8 gripe#2: why did f8's pm-hibernate regress?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



tor, 03 01 2008 kl. 18:45 +0100, skrev nodata:
> Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 02:03 -0600 schrieb Douglas McClendon:
> > Douglas McClendon wrote:
> > 
> > [ pro-tux-on-ice rant snipped ]
> > 
> > > might be time for me to go back to tux-on-ice.  I truly am disgusted by 
> > > having to suffer through 5-15 seconds of thrashing while changing 
> > > desktops after resume.  I would much rather the resume take 20 seconds 
> > > longer, and present me with a good user experience.  (yes, I am one of 
> > > those people that thinks that offering early login while the system 
> > > finishes booting is a really stupid thing).
> > 
> > To clarify this harsh, theoretically offensive statement-  Early login 
> > done _right_ would be fine.  Doing it the incomplete way, such as the 
> > vista experience, 
> 
> I don't know why people keep saying this. Vista boots fast and is
> responsive.

Wow.. can I have a puff at that crack pipe my good man? :)

I install Vista on this laptop a few days ago, compared to Fedora 8 both
boot time and responsiveness is much worse. Using Vista was like being
waist deep in molasses - on a Core 2 Duo machine with a gig of ram.

Now I think we can all do better, but to call Vista fast and responsive
is in my experience just not true. 

Wow.. can I have a puff at that crack pipe my good man? 

- David

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux