Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 02:03 -0600 schrieb Douglas McClendon: > Douglas McClendon wrote: > > [ pro-tux-on-ice rant snipped ] > > > might be time for me to go back to tux-on-ice. I truly am disgusted by > > having to suffer through 5-15 seconds of thrashing while changing > > desktops after resume. I would much rather the resume take 20 seconds > > longer, and present me with a good user experience. (yes, I am one of > > those people that thinks that offering early login while the system > > finishes booting is a really stupid thing). > > To clarify this harsh, theoretically offensive statement- Early login > done _right_ would be fine. Doing it the incomplete way, such as the > vista experience, I don't know why people keep saying this. Vista boots fast and is responsive. > is IMO a regression, not a feature. I.e. it boggles > my mind that fast boot-to-login time is perceived as so valuable, that > the implementers will let a user's first experience with the system be > at its absolute valley(anti-peak) responsiveness phase. > > I guess for early login this isn't so bad, as people just learn that the > fast boot time is an illusion and that it's better to sit back and let > the system IO settle before using it. But what started my rant was the > swsusp choice, which is not workaroundable by just letting the system IO > settle. > > and the 5-15 seconds was a bit of an exageration, more like 5-10. But > still, evocative of winblowz 3.1 swap thrashing.... > > </rant> > > -dmc > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
