On 02/12/2007, Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@xxxxxx> wrote: > > The point remains though: no matter what side of the fence you sit on > > regarding greater package granularity, I think Tom is bang on the > > money - crafting a guideline to fit the broad and diverse range of > > upstream packages in order to achieve your desired goal seems > > impossible to me. Arguing over the merits or otherwise of increasing > > the packaging granularity isn't going to change anything. If you > > really believe this is an important and required change, try drafting > > the guideline. > > If you had read my initial posting you would have noticed that I had > simply asked if such guidelines wouldn't be a useful thing. I don't > care if there are or not as long as package maintainers respond in a > reasonable and cooperative way to user request/concerns. I imagine most packagers would react favourably to such requests, given a reasonable use case, and even better, a spec file patch. Have you submitted a patch for your vtk case for discussion to the package maintainer? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
