> The point remains though: no matter what side of the fence you sit on > regarding greater package granularity, I think Tom is bang on the > money - crafting a guideline to fit the broad and diverse range of > upstream packages in order to achieve your desired goal seems > impossible to me. Arguing over the merits or otherwise of increasing > the packaging granularity isn't going to change anything. If you > really believe this is an important and required change, try drafting > the guideline. If you had read my initial posting you would have noticed that I had simply asked if such guidelines wouldn't be a useful thing. I don't care if there are or not as long as package maintainers respond in a reasonable and cooperative way to user request/concerns. -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list