Dnia 2007-12-01, o godz. 13:11:41 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> napisał(a): > A standard policy is not desirable in my opinion. More subpackages > may allow for better granularity, but the user has to install > and sometime know about more packages. There is also added > packaging complexity. So definitely the packager choice. There's also more metadata, so even slower yum (not that you can actually notice at this point), some people might even think it's a bad idea at the repository/distribution level. On the other hand, subpackages are the only way to escape the infamous "dependency hell" that's still scaring some people away from Fedora. Lam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
