Re: Guidelines for creating subpackages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/12/2007, Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Finally, the case of the plplot package shows that my initial request
> is by no means exotic, and I maintain my point that it would be sign
> of userfriendliness not to impose unneeded packages like the ones
> enumerated above on a user of the vtk package.

The point remains though: no matter what side of the fence you sit on
regarding greater package granularity, I think Tom is bang on the
money - crafting a guideline to fit the broad and diverse range of
upstream packages in order to achieve your desired goal seems
impossible to me. Arguing over the merits or otherwise of increasing
the packaging granularity isn't going to change anything. If you
really believe this is an important and required change, try drafting
the guideline.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux