On Dec 1, 2007 9:47 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christopher Stone wrote: > > > All I am saying is that if we want Fedora to be used as a base > > distribution for other distributions, we need to start focusing a lot > > more as a community on making sub-packages for optional requirements. > > I'm curious, can you describe precisely the reasoning from > 1. more subpkgs for optional components > ... > X. improves fedora as a base > X+1. profit! > ? Sorry, confused by X and X+1 and profit! Have no clue what you are talking about. Can you try being more down to earth please. > It's not entirely clear to me that making subpkgs is really a (or the!) > major requirement for X. It's very simple. It will allow you to more easily make a customized distribution from a Fedora base. If you cannot understand this simple concept, I'm afraid I cannot explain it to you in any more simpler terms. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
