On Dec 1, 2007 9:13 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christopher Stone wrote: > > > This is an *extremely* important topic. > > > > Let's face it, if Fedora wants to have any hope of becoming a base > > distribution for all other distributions, then all optional requires > > will need to be split into sub-packages. > > > > We must have as fine a granularity in our packages as possible. > > When/if it makes sense, and doesn't create an unduly increased maintainance > burden, sure. All I am saying is that if we want Fedora to be used as a base distribution for other distributions, we need to start focusing a lot more as a community on making sub-packages for optional requirements. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
