Christopher Stone wrote: > All I am saying is that if we want Fedora to be used as a base > distribution for other distributions, we need to start focusing a lot > more as a community on making sub-packages for optional requirements. I'm curious, can you describe precisely the reasoning from 1. more subpkgs for optional components ... X. improves fedora as a base X+1. profit! ? It's not entirely clear to me that making subpkgs is really a (or the!) major requirement for X. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
