On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 16:37 -0300, Martin Marques wrote: > Jesse Keating escribió: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:57:07 -0300 > > Martin Marques <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> git<date> from where? Remember that git is distributed and unless you > >> have a centralized copy git<date> can have more then one copy. > >> > >> IMHO, I've seen many cvs<date>, svn<date>, etc. that it'a when there > >> isn't a real version numbering (or patches come from svn, cvs, hg, > >> git, instead of new tarballs). > > > > Wrong directions. <date><scm> > > OK, why not <date><scm><sha1-hash> > > The hash lets you identify the git or hg version uniquely. > > With cvs or svn there wouldn't be any hash. This is exactly what the guidelines say. Is anyone reading them? :P ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
