Steve Grubb wrote: > kdepim-enterprise-svn20070926.tar.bz2 As a side note, I always wondered why to use date in the release tag of package, whose sources come from non-cvs versioning system. For svn, in my opinion, it would make more sense to use the tree revision number; for git, similarly, sha1 id of the tree. Could the guideline [1] wording be adjusted to point packagers towards those less ambiguous identifiers? Or maybe the intention of the release tag is not so much to be truly non-ambiguous about the actual origin of the sources, as rather to give a rough idea when was the commit done? [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease > > -Steve > Thanks, PM
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
