Bill Nottingham escribió:
Petr Machata (pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
Steve Grubb wrote:
kdepim-enterprise-svn20070926.tar.bz2
As a side note, I always wondered why to use date in the release tag of
package, whose sources come from non-cvs versioning system. For svn, in
my opinion, it would make more sense to use the tree revision number;
for git, similarly, sha1 id of the tree.
Well, git<date> sorts sanely. git<sha1> does not. Comments in the spec
(or similar) might help with this.
git<date> from where? Remember that git is distributed and unless you
have a centralized copy git<date> can have more then one copy.
IMHO, I've seen many cvs<date>, svn<date>, etc. that it'a when there
isn't a real version numbering (or patches come from svn, cvs, hg, git,
instead of new tarballs).
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
