Re: Codec Buddy misleading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark wrote:
2007/11/10, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:56:43AM +0100, Mark wrote:
with the codecs is..?? sounds kinda strange but it does seem to be the
case.. (same case for freedesktop.org)

so hows that working?
SF.net just provides hosting and shelters under the US "hey we just host it"
protections

i still don't see why it can't be hosted on fedora.. i understand the
patent part but if SF can do it than anyone can right? it's not that
fedora has more users than sf.net.. i think it's actually the
opposite.

I just find it all very strange.. some us sites can host it.. some
can't.. it's confusing.

That's law for you.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux