Re: Codec Buddy misleading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2007/11/10, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:56:43AM +0100, Mark wrote:
> > with the codecs is..?? sounds kinda strange but it does seem to be the
> > case.. (same case for freedesktop.org)
> >
> > so hows that working?
>
> SF.net just provides hosting and shelters under the US "hey we just host it"
> protections

i still don't see why it can't be hosted on fedora.. i understand the
patent part but if SF can do it than anyone can right? it's not that
fedora has more users than sf.net.. i think it's actually the
opposite.

I just find it all very strange.. some us sites can host it.. some
can't.. it's confusing.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux