On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 02:35:35 +0100 Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2007/11/10, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:56:43AM +0100, Mark wrote: > > > with the codecs is..?? sounds kinda strange but it does seem to be the > > > case.. (same case for freedesktop.org) > > > > > > so hows that working? > > > > SF.net just provides hosting and shelters under the US "hey we just host it" > > protections > > i still don't see why it can't be hosted on fedora.. i understand the > patent part but if SF can do it than anyone can right? it's not that > fedora has more users than sf.net.. i think it's actually the > opposite. > > I just find it all very strange.. some us sites can host it.. some > can't.. it's confusing. If you really want to know the answer to this question, you should seek out a lawyer familiar with the US laws. Asking on a developers mailing list is not a good idea. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
