Re: Dropping Base X group? [Was: Re: KDE logout options with F8]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas <pertusus <at> free.fr> writes:
> I am a small desktop user. For the display managers, there are wdm, 
> xdm and slim (but they lack integration with consolekit). For the

I think my KDM ConsoleKit patch should be fairly easy to adapt to any 
XDM-derived display manager, as KDM is also derived from XDM. The only caveat 
is that it includes GPL code derived from GDM, so it will make your display 
manager GPLed, and you can't use it if its license isn't GPL-compatible. 
(Luckily, the X11 license used in XDM is GPL-compatible.)

> to package ivman for automounting, but it turned out to have too 
> much issues. I have developped halevt to replace ivman, but so far 
> nobody has packaged it (I don't want to maintain it in fedora since 
> I am upstream).

I think you should really maintain it in Fedora. Being upstream, you're the one 
who knows it best, and you also actively use the package. Moreover, you're 
already an experienced Fedora packager, so your case is different from the one 
of upstream developers only wanting to get their software into Fedora which you 
identify as a possible cause of conflicts of interest (but which IMHO isn't 
necessarily bad either).

I'm the upstream maintainer of Quarticurve, the unofficial Qt 4 port of the 
Bluecurve widget theme, and I maintain it in Fedora. The situation was much 
like yours, Fedora is the first distribution to package it. And I think it's 
working out well.

> For openoffice, I haven't seen obvious replacements (I tried 
> to package Ted, but it is a nightmare).

KOffice maybe? Yes, it requires the kdelibs, but it's not anywhere near as 
bloated as OO.o is.

If you can live without a full office suite, AbiWord and Gnumeric are also good 
options.

> To replace firefox, there is dillo, but it lacks functionalities, more
> promising is links-hacked (I have a spec) or maybe links2.

Hmmm, maybe Konqueror? But then you'll be loading most of KDE into memory 
anyway, so why not use KDE in the first place? ;-)

By the way, this isn't that wacky a question, people from KDE and GNOME have 
analyzed memory requirements for different setups, and the lightweight WM setup 
ended up requiring more memory once they started different apps, because they 
all used different libraries or no libraries at all, whereas the full desktop 
environments have most of their code shared across applications.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux